Hurd v. Woodward Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York
• In Equity. .Suit.by James D. Hurd, the Consolidated Rubber Tire Company, ■ and the Rubber Tire Wheel Company against the Woodward Company. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
The complainants, licensees and owners of the Grant patent, No.- 554,675, dated February 18, 1896, for rubber-tired wheel, sue the defendant, the Woodward Company, of the city of Albany, N. Y., for infringement of such patent, and pray a preliminary injunction, as it is conceded by the defendant for the purposes of this motion (quoting from defendant’s brief) “that the alleged infringing construction complained of — i. e., that upon which the complainants have based their motion — falls within the scope of the claims of the patent in suit.”
Assuming the patent to be valid,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hurd v. SeimU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1911
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hurd v. James Goold Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1912