Hurd v. James Goold Co.
District Court, N.D. New York
In Equity. Suit by James D. Surd, Consolidated Rubber Tire Company, and the Rubber Tire Wheel Company against James Goold Company. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
The validity of the Grant patent, No.
554,675, dated February 18, 1896, for rubber tired wheel, has been declared by the Supreme Court of the United States in Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. and Rubber Tire Wheel Co. (April 10, 1911) 220 U. S. 428, 31 Sup. Ct. 444, 55 L. Ed. 527. Prior to this decision the lower courts had differed as to the validity of this patent, and while in the Second circuit it had been held valid, in the Indiana circuit (Circuit Court) and in the Sixth circuit (Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Rubber Tire Wheel Co., 116…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Keeler v. Standard Folding Bed Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Rubber Tire Wheel Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- Consolidated Rubber Tire Co. v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Innis, Speiden & Co. v. Food Machinery Corp.District Court, D. Delaware · 1942