Legal Opinion

Citizens for Responsible Transportation v. Draper City

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 2008No. 20070677PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

{1 In this case, Citizens for Responsible Transportation (CRT) appeals from an order of the district court denying CRTs motion for summary judgment and granting Draper City's motion to dismiss. The district court dismissed CRTs claim on the basis that Draper City Resolution No. 06-71 was not subject to referendum. CRT asks that we reverse the dismissal and remand the claim to the district court. We affirm.

BACKGROUND

T2 In 2004, five counties and thirty-five cities entered into an agreement with UTA entitled Master Interlocal Agreement Regarding Fixed Guideway…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lyon v. BurtonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Grayson Roper Ltd. Partnership v. FinlinsonUtah Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State ex rel. Z.C.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Keigley v. Bench, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Dooling v. City CouncilMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing Homeowners Ass'n v. Davencourt at Pilgrims Landing, LCUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  2. J.M.W. v. T.I.Z.Utah Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Essential Botanical Farms, LC v. KayUtah Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Suarez v. Grand CountyUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Downing v. Hyland PharmacyUtah Supreme Court · 2008

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API