Legal Opinion

STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. Martin

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 21, 2010No. SCBD No. 5518. OBAD No. 1784PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.

1 1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint and of its disposition?1 and (2) Is a public *694reprimand an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respondent's breach of professional ethics? We answer both questions in the affirmative.

I

INTRODUCTION TO THE RECORD

12 The Oklahoma Bar Association (Bar) commenced this disciplinary proceeding on March 6, 2009 against Jeffrey Allen Martin (respondent or Martin), a licensed lawyer, by…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  4. In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LAYTONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
  2. State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
  3. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. GAINESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
  4. People v. CalvertSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. JACKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API