STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA BAR ASS'N v. Martin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtOpala, J.
1 1 In this disciplinary proceeding against a lawyer, the issues to be decided are: (1) Does the record submitted for our examination provide sufficient evidence for a meaningful de novo consideration of the complaint and of its disposition?1 and (2) Is a public *694reprimand an appropriate disciplinary sanction for respondent's breach of professional ethics? We answer both questions in the affirmative.
I
INTRODUCTION TO THE RECORD
12 The Oklahoma Bar Association (Bar) commenced this disciplinary proceeding on March 6, 2009 against Jeffrey Allen Martin (respondent or Martin), a licensed lawyer, by…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DonnellySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- In Re Integration of State Bar of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. FarrantSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. LAYTONSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2014
- State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. GAINESSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- People v. CalvertSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
- STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. JACKSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2021
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.