Legal Opinion
Jamieson v. City Council of Carpinteria
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 28, 2012No. B232348PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PERREN, J.
—Lee Jamieson appeals a judgment denying his petition for administrative mandamus challenging the City of Carpintería’s denial of his request for a development permit to enlarge a patio on beachfront property. We affirm.
STATEMENT OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND1
Appellant Lee Jamieson is the owner of a beachfront condominium on Sandyland Road in respondent City of Carpintería (the City). In 1967, several owners of beachfront property in the City, including Jamieson’s predecessor in interest, initiated a quiet title action, challenging the public use of the beach pursuant to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Johnson v. City of Loma LindaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- McDonald v. Antelope Valley Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- San Franciscans Upholding the Downtown Plan v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Desmond v. County of Contra CostaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Benson v. Southern California Auto Sales, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Sargon Enterprises, Inc. v. University of Southern CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Estate of JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Needelman v. Dewolf Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- People v. Vanguard Outdoor CA2/1California Court of Appeal · 2014