Legal Opinion

McGann v. Union Pacific Railroad

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided July 27, 1971No. Civ. No. 70-800Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ALFRED T. GOODWIN, District Judge:

Plaintiff sued for damages arising out of an alleged wrongful discharge from his employment as a railroad brakeman. Defendant has moved to dismiss the action on the ground that the subject matter of the claim is within the exclusive, primary jurisdiction of the National Railroad Adjustment Board (NRAB).

Plaintiff relies principally upon Moore v. Illinois Central R. Co., 312 U.S. 630, 61 S.Ct. 754, 85 L.Ed. 1089 (1941), and Transcontinental and Western Air, Inc. *669v. Koppal, 345 U.S. 653, 73 S.Ct. 906, 97 L.Ed. 1325 (1953), for the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Moore v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. International Ass'n of MacHinists v. Central Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Transcontinental & Western Air, Inc. v. KoppalSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Walker v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API