Legal Opinion

State v. Milk Handlers & Processors Ass'n

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 3, 1967PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The Attorney-General brings this action to enjoin the defendants, wholesale milk dealers, from engaging in certain practices claimed to be in violation of section 340 of the General Business Law, commonly called the Donnelly Act. The Attorney-General moved at Special Term for a temporary injunction and several defendants cross-moved to dismiss the complaint. Special Term denied both applications.

The cross motion was based on two contentions; firstly, that the allegations of the complaint are insufficient in that they are confined to specific instances of acts which, while they may be acts…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. Milk Handlers & Processors Ass'nNew York Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Atkin v. Union Processing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. Pharmaceutical Society v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. State v. Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  4. Kick v. ReganAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Lennon v. Philip Morris CompaniesNew York Supreme Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API