Legal Opinion

State v. Eddy

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 5, 1991No. C 89-08-34099; CA A63783PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Defendant appeals her conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). She assigns error to the denial of her motion to suppress cocaine in a paper envelope that the police found inside a brown leather pouch that was inside her purse. We affirm.

The court made certain findings. Portland Police Officer Wong stopped defendant at 11 p.m. for speeding and failing to stop at a stop sign. Defendant was driving, and a male passenger sat next to her. Wong shined his flashlight into the passenger area and saw that defendant had bloodshot eyes and dilated pupils that reacted poorly…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. PruettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ClaxtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State v. GothamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. GothamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API