Legal Opinion

State v. Claxton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 1996No. C90-11-36228; CA A70528PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Defendant appealed from his convictions for possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, and unlawful possession of a firearm, ORS 166.250, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress. We affirmed the trial court’s denial of the motion, 126 Or App 35, 867 P2d 526 (1994). The Supreme Court has remanded the case for reconsideration, State v. Claxton, 321 Or 377, 899 P2d 690 (1995), in the light of State v. Dominguez-Martinez, 321 Or 206, 895 P2d 306 (1995). On reconsideration, we reverse.

At midnight on October 16, 1990, Officer Rivett stopped defendant for towing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. BatesOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. Dominguez-MartinezOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. KnoxCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  5. State v. AuerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  2. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  4. State v. MayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  5. State v. HadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API