Legal Opinion

State v. Gotham

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 13, 1991No. 89-09-34920; CA A65597PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1). He assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence and its response to a question from the jury. We affirm.

We take the facts from the trial court’s findings, which are supported by the evidence. Officer Berg saw defendant behind the wheel of a pickup that was blocking a sidewalk. He was revving the engine, which resulted in a large amount of noise and smoke. When Berg approached him, defendant left the pickup and walked down the sidewalk. When Berg ordered him to stop,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
  4. State v. HawkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. State v. EddyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. CramptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  2. State v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. State v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  4. State v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API