State v. Gotham
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(1). He assigns as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence and its response to a question from the jury. We affirm.
We take the facts from the trial court’s findings, which are supported by the evidence. Officer Berg saw defendant behind the wheel of a pickup that was blocking a sidewalk. He was revving the engine, which resulted in a large amount of noise and smoke. When Berg approached him, defendant left the pickup and walked down the sidewalk. When Berg ordered him to stop,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- State v. BoydCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- State v. HawkCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- State v. EddyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. CramptonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- State v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- State v. DickersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995