Legal Opinion

Darmour Productions Corp. v. Herbert M. Baruch Corp.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1933No. Docket No. 8126PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHBALD, J., pro tem.

Plaintiff’s amended complaint alleges that on and prior to August 12, 1930, it was engaged in the production of a certain moving picture and had in its employment and under contract a large number of persons as.actors therein, among whom was one Ann Christy; that up to the time mentioned said actress had taken leading parts in said picture and appeared in various scenes and portions thereof already photographed and completed; that plaintiff • had expended large sums of money on said production; that said Ann Christy “is of a special and unique type of motion picture…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tompkins v. Pacific Mutual Life InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Kramer v. Wolf Cigar Stores Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1906
  3. New York Central Rd. v. WilerOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Texas Life Insurance Co. v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Offshore Rental Co. v. Continental Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Fifield Manor v. FinstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  4. I. J. Weinrot & Son, Inc. v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Templeton Feed & Grain v. Ralston Purina Co.California Supreme Court · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API