Legal Opinion

New York Central Rd. v. Wiler

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1931No. 22770PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.

The question here is whether the action is one for malpractice, and therefore subject to the limitation of Section 11225, General Code, and the rule of law announced by this court in the case of Youngstown Park & Falls Street Ry. Co. v. Kessler, 84 Ohio St., 74, 95 N. E., 509, 36 L. R. A. (N. S.), 50, Ann. Cas., 1912B, 933, or whether it is the character of an action for bodily injury contemplated by the limitation of Section 11224-1, General Code.

The plaintiff in error, relying upon the holding of this court in Railway Co. v. Kessler, supra, assumes that when a railway company employs a…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hoover v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
  2. Ervin v. American Guardian Life Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Ahnert v. WildmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Darmour Productions Corp. v. Herbert M. Baruch Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Price v. Cleveland Clinic FoundationOhio Court of Appeals · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API