Legal Opinion
Moore v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 23, 1998No. 93-134LPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is a class action brought by persons claiming that their rights to recovery of lands underlying an abandoned railroad track were taken by the United States without compensation when it permitted interposition of a recreational trail used by the general public. Pending is a motion by plaintiffs for clarification of the class certification order. As explained by the court during oral argument, and as plaintiffs agreed, the motion is more properly treated as one for leave to amend the complaint to include additional plaintiffs as part of their class.1 As is often the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Preseault v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- The Snoqualmie Tribe of Indians, on Its Own Behalf, and on Relation of the Skykomish Tribe of Indians v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- John G. Vann and Birmingham Fire Insurance Company of Pennsylvania v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- Morin v. TrupinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Moore v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Slattery v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Fifth Third Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
- Illig v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004