Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kenneth R. Kratz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2014No. 2011AP002758-DPublished

1Concurrence

*721SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J.

¶ 72. {concurring). I join the per curiam opinion.

¶ 73. The OLR disciplinary system is about 15 years old. Several anomalies and proposed amendments have been brought to the court's attention. It is time for the court to institute a review of the system rather than to make piecemeal adjustments at this time. See my writings in OLR v. Johns, 2014 WI 32, 353 Wis. 2d 746, 847 N.W.2d 179; OLR v. Osicka, 2014 WI 33, 353 Wis. 2d 656, 847 N.W.2d 343; and OLR v. Osicka, 2014 WI 34, 353 Wis. 2d 675, 847 N.W.2d 333; of even date.

¶ 74. I welcome Justice Prosser's support for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Daniel W. Johns, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tim OsickaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tim OsickaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API