Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael J. Hicks
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Per curiam
f 1. We review the report of the referee, Attorney James J. Winiarski. Based on the change of Attorney Michael J. Hicks' answer to a no contest plea pursuant to SCR 22.14(2), the referee concluded that Attorney Hicks had committed each of the 19 counts of professional misconduct alleged in the complaint filed by the Office of Lawyer Regulation (OLR). Referee Winiarski recommends that the court suspend the license of Attorney Michael J. Hicks for a period of one year consecutive to the two-year suspension imposed in Case No. 2014AP7-D, In re Disciplinary Proceedings Against Hicks, 2016 Wi 9,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tim OsickaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Patrick M. CooperWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Tim OsickaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Tyrus Lee CooperWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. Tyrus Lee CooperWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. Tyrus Lee CooperWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. Tyrus Lee CooperWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019