Same v. Same
Wisconsin Supreme Court
The case being again before the circuit court for Marquette county, it was referred to Satterlee Clark, a court commissioner, who notified the parties to appear before him, and state an account between them.
Read the full summary
The case being again before the circuit court for Marquette county, it was referred to Satterlee Clark, a court commissioner, who notified the parties to appear before him, and state an account between them. His report shows that upon the examination the defendants introduced their accounts, numbered from 1 to 73, purporting to be an account of expenditures and receipts from July 23, 184ci, to the time of taking the account, February 27, 1856; that is, from the date of the agreement between Reed and Jones for the sale of the land. These accounts are entitled as follows: 1st. Mill Account, No.…
1Opinion of the Court
By thejOourt,
Cole, J.
When this case was before this court at the December term, 1854, the rights of the respective parties under the contract of July 23d, 1846, were adjudicated and settled: and therefore the questions arising upon the contract are not now before us for consideration. All that remains to be done in the case is to carry out the decree then pronounced in the cause.
*463The decree remanded the cause to the circuit court, with directions to said court to enter an order therein, referring the same to a commissioner, to bring before him upon proper notice, the parties to this cause, and…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Patten Paper Co. v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Ean v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- Reed v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1862
- Town of Waupun v. Town of ChesterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Ex Rel. Reinhart v. CallahanNevada Supreme Court · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.