Legal Opinion

Patten Paper Co. v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1896PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Milwaukee county: R. N. Austin, Judge. The portions of the judgment material on this appeal are as follows: ■ ■ ‘‘First.

Read the full summary

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Milwaukee county: R. N. Austin, Judge. The portions of the judgment material on this appeal are as follows: ■ ■ ‘‘First. Upon motion of Hooper & Hooper, plaintiff’s attorneys; it is considered, adjudged, and decreed, as in favor of the Patten Paper Company {Limited), Union Pulp Company and Fox Pvoer Pulp and Paper Company against all the defendants, that all of the water of the river, except that required for purposes of navigation, shall be and is hereby divided and apportioned between and to the south, middle, and north channels of the river…

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed March 10, 1896:-

Cassoday, 0. J.

This case was here upon former appeals. 90 Wis. 370. Those appeals were by three of the defendants in the cross bill filed by the canal company from 80> much and such part of the judgment of the trial court as sustained the paramount right of the canal company to all the water power created by the government dam at Kau-kauna, and the exclusive right to use, or authorize others to use, the same wherever it might be available for water power, and to return the water to the river wherever it should see fit; but the balance of that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Aspen Mining & Smelting Co. v. BillingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Attorney General v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Kaukauna Water Power Co. v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Stewart v. SalamonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Stump v. HornbackSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Ott v. BoringWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Stimson v. StimsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Fullerton Lumber Co. v. TorborgWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Ean v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Galbreath v. WallrichSupreme Court of Colorado · 1910

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API