Conklin v. Conklin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from an order vacating a judgment for alimony and modifying the original decree of divorce by relieving defendant of back payments of alimony from and after January 5, 1986, of future alimony as well, and restraining plaintiff from attempting to collect the same from defendant.
Plaintiff, after living with defendant for over 18 years, obtained a divorce from him in 1926 by default. She was awarded custody of their son, then 18 years old. The divorce decree, dated April 22, 1926, provided for- alimony of $100 per month. Until January 5, 1936, defendant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hartigan v. HartiganSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- Bensel v. HallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Plankers v. PlankersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
3Cited by8 opinions
- Zieman v. ZiemanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
- Rumpf v. RumpfTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
- LeFebvre v. LeFebvreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Schmidt v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.