Legal Opinion
City of Los Angeles v. Board of Supervisors
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 12, 1930No. Docket No. 4055PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
This is a motion to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that the appellant has failed to file its opening brief in due time. The appellant has applied to be relieved from such default on the grounds of inadvertence and excusable neglect.
The appeal is from a judgment denying appellant’s application for a writ of mandate to compel the cancellation, pursuant to the provisions of section 3804a of the Political Code, of all assessment certificates of sale for delinquent taxes and tax deeds of its lands in Mono County, on the ground that such land is exempt from taxation.
The transcript on…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Waybright v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Haviland v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
- Gorman v. California Transit Co.California Supreme Court · 1926
- Hagenkamp v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- H. G. B. Alexander & Co. v. MartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Flores v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Nilsson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- LeDeit v. EhlertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Nilsson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967