Legal Opinion

Gorman v. California Transit Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1926No. Docket No. Sac. 3729PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Sullivan & Sullivan and Thee. J. Roche for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.

This appeal is from an order granting the defendant’s motion to set aside and vacate a judgment taken against it by default upon the ground that such default and judgment were the result of the excusable inadvertence and neglect of the defendant. The facts preceding and attending the making and entry of such default and judgment as set forth in the affidavits filed in support of said motion and against the truth of which the appellants made no counter showing at the hearing thereon, are as follows: On January 4, 1924, the plaintiffs commenced this action in Alameda County against the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nicoll v. WeldonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Jergins v. SchenckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Slater v. SeloverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Benjamin v. Dalmo Manufacturing Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Yarbrough v. YarbroughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  3. Burbank v. Continental Life Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Kooper v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
  5. Roehl v. the Texas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API