Legal Opinion

Flores v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles County

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 15, 1970No. Civ. 36411PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROTH, P. J.

This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for relief under section 946.6 of the Government Code from the tardy filing of a claim under section 911.2 of that code.

On March 15, 1969, appellants’ child was delivered at the Los Angeles County-University of California Medical Center (Medical Center). Allegedly by reason of medically inappropriate procedures, a depressed skull fracture was occasioned during delivery and as a consequence the child died on the day of its birth.

Government Code, section 911.2 requires that a claim relating to a cause of action for death or…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tammen v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Daley v. County of ButteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Viles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Shearman v. JorgensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Stub v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Elston v. City of TurlockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bettencourt v. Los Rios Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Ebersol v. CowanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Kleinke v. City of Ocean CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  5. Shank v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API