Legal Opinion
H. G. B. Alexander & Co. v. Martz
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1928No. Docket No. 5878PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The respondents have made a motion to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that appellant failed for more than thirty days after filing his transcript to file his opening brief as required by subdivision 4 of Buie II of the rules governing the practice in the supreme court and district courts of appeal. The appellant seeks to be relieved of his failure to comply on the ground that it was occasioned through inadvertence and excusable neglect of his counsel. From the affidavit of one of counsel it appears that the transcript was filed on September 20, 1927; that for the past eight years…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McCabe v. HealeyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Hagenkamp v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Erving v. Napa Valley Brewing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
3Cited by9 opinions
- Flores v. Board of Supervisors of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Nilsson v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Renteria v. Juvenile Justice, Department of Corrections & RehabilitationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Garcia v. GalloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- City of Los Angeles v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.