Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

C. D. Hauger Co. v. Abramson

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 4, 1926No. 6 Div. 726PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, X

The case was tried on count A, claiming damages for unlawful search of plaintiff’s premises for elothing as merchandise. The pleas were in short, by consent.

If there is evidence to support the plaintiff’s complaint, it is error for the court to direct a verdict. McMillan v. Aiken, 205 Ala. 35, 40, 88 So. 135; Amerson v. Corona Coal & Iron Co., 194 Ala. 175, 69 So. 601; Shipp v. Shelton, 193 Ala. 658, 69 So. 102; Southern States Fire Insurance Co. v. Kronenberg, 199 Ala. 164, 74 So. 63. There was no error in declining the affirmative instruction requested.

Conceding that the ground for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  2. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Shipp v. SheltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  4. Amerson v. Corona Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. Southern States Fire Ins. v. KronenbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fidelity-Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. MurphySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Bull v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  3. Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Alexiou v. ChristuSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  5. Clenney v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API