Legal Opinion

State v. Francis

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 2016No. 20150280PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Curtis Francis appeals- from a criminal judgment after conditionally pleading guilty to gathering signatures within 100 feet of a polling place. We conclude the electioneering law -he was charged under does not violate the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, and it is a reasonable restriction on the North Dakota' Constitution’s initiated ballot measure provisioii. We also conclude Francis has failed to show he was selectively prosecuted. We affirm the judgment.

I

[¶ 2] Francis and another man, Michael Dax, were collecting signatures near the Jamestown Civic…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. United States v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Forsyth County v. Nationalist MovementSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Burson v. FreemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Black Hills Trucking, Inc. v. North Dakota Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. KennyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. Black Hills Trucking, Inc. v. North Dakota Industrial CommissionNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API