Legal Opinion
Davis v. Hollins Law
District Court, E.D. California
Decided June 12, 2014No. CIV. S-12-3107 LKK/ACPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael Davis sued defendant Hollins Law, A Professional Corporation, alleging violations of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692-1692p (“FDCPA”) and California’s Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, Cal. Civ.Code §§ 1788-1788.33 '(“Rosenthal Act”). The gravamen of plaintiffs complaint was that defendant placed collection calls to his home phone, and left a voicemail message which failed to disclose that the communication was from a debt collector, thereby violating both statutes.
On April 15, 2014,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Ingram v. OroudjianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Nautilus Marine Enterprises, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corporation & Exxon Shipping Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Barefield v. HSBC Holdings PLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- BMO Bank N.A. v. SBFS Trucking, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Celestine v. FCA US LLCDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Collins Charo Capital LLC v. BidenDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.