Legal Opinion

Fansteel Metallurgical Corporation v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 8, 1959No. 170-58PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARAMORE, Judge.

In a suit by plaintiff Fansteel Metallurgical Corporation under a supply contract, the Government has counterclaimed for alleged overpayments to plaintiff. Plaintiff has filed motion for summary judgment dismissing the counterclaim on the ground that plaintiff’s affirmative defenses to the counterclaim cannot be denied and are dispositive of defendant’s counterclaim. The affirmative defenses are: (1) The defendant is precluded, as a matter of law, from recovering on its counterclaim because of the provisions of section 49 of the Uniform Sales Act, Ill. Rev.Stat. ch. 121%, §…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. United States v. City & County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. United States v. StewartSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  5. Royal Indemnity Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Campbell v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  2. Barrett Refining Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
  3. J. A. Jones Construction Company v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
  4. Alcoa, Inc. v. Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  5. Penn-Ohio Steel Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API