Legal Opinion
Campbell v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 11, 1983No. 493-81CPublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MAYER, Judge.
Plaintiff, an officer in the United States Army Reserve, and an attorney proceeding pro se in this court, brought suit claiming pay and allowances for two periods of active duty for training (ADT) performed in 1981. While the case was pending in the old Court of Claims, defendant paid plaintiff for the two periods. One was paid in full,* but the other reflected a setoff for pay and allowances during a period of ADT in 1979 for which plaintiff had allegedly been overpaid. The latter period is the focus of the parties’ attention now.
Defendant states that on June…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jack Burton Tunnell v. Doris Wiley and Richard Sprague, First Asst. District AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Robert Willetts v. Ford Motor Company and United Auto Workers of America, Local 898Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
- Don McGuire v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., Columbia Broadcasting System Films, Inc., and General FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Reading & Bates Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- ThermoCor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Kinetic Structures Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Betz v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
- Bromley Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.