Legal Opinion

Volbers-Klarich v. Middletown Management, Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 18, 2010No. 2009-933PublishedCited by 157 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

I. Introduction

{¶ 1} The primary question before the court is this: when a vendor fraudulently charges its customer a nonexistent tax, must the customer attempt to recover those funds through a “refund” from the taxing authority, or may the customer attempt to recover those funds directly from the vendor? We must also determine whether the appellant herein pleaded fraud with sufficient particularity and whether appellant’s claim seeking certification of a class action alleging a violation of the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act (“OCSPA”), R.C. Chapter 1345, stated a claim upon which relief…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. University Community Tenants Union, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Ass'n for Defense of Washington Local School District v. KigerOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Vail v. Plain Dealer Publishing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by157 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. HennessOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. Greene v. Gerber Products Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 2017
  3. In re Porsche Cars North America, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  4. State ex rel. Striker v. ClineOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Corcoran v. CVS Health Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2016

152 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API