National Labor Relations Board v. Local 1445, United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, Afl-Cio, Gallahue's Supermarkets, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SKINNER, District Judge.
This case is before the Court on application of the National Labor Relations Board (Board) pursuant to Section 10(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 160(e), for enforcement of its order issued against Local 1445 of the United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, AFL-CIO (Union) and reported at 247 NLRB No. 151. Gallahue’s Supermarkets, Inc. (Company) has intervened on the side of the Board.
The Board has concluded that the Union violated Section 8(b)(2) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(2), when it demanded that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Seven-Up Bottling Co. of Miami, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- National Labor Relations Board v. Raytheon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Radio-Electronics Officers Union (Radio Officers Union) v. The National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994
- Production Workers Union of Chicago and Vicinity, Local 707 v. National Labor Relations Board, and Faustino Ramos, Intervening Cross-InterveningCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Laborers' International Union of North America, Local 578 v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- NLRB v. Optica Lee BorinquenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- National Labor Relations Board v. Optica Lee Borinquen, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993