Legal Opinion

Guhring v. Gumpper

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 8, 1933PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.

Plaintiff was injured as the result of a collision between a car operated by him and a truck operated by the servant and agent of the defendant at the intersection of Grove and Prospect Streets in the city of Waterbury. Prospect Street runs north and south and is intersected by Grove Street which runs east and west. Near the easterly curb of Prospect Street, thirty-five and six-tenths feet south of the southerly curb of Grove Street and twenty-nine feet south of the point where Prospect Street intersects the nearest property line of Grove Street, there is a “stop” sign erected by the traffic…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hellman v. KarpSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  2. Goldstein v. KaplanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Katsetos v. NolanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  2. Hartford Division, Emhart Industries, Inc. v. Amalgamated Local Union 376Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Stitham v. LewareSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  4. Sitnik v. National Propane CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  5. Carilli v. Pension CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API