Legal Opinion

Arthurs Ex Rel. Estate of Munn v. Aiken County

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 23, 2001No. 25331PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PLEICONES, Justice:

Petitioner sued respondent, the Aiken County Sheriffs Department (Department), for negligence leading to the murder of petitioner’s sister (Deborah) by her estranged husband (Husband). The circuit court granted Department’s directed verdict motion, and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Arthurs v. Aiken County, South Carolina Sheriffs Dep’t, 338 S.C. 253, 525 S.E.2d 542 (Ct.App.1999). We granted certiorari to consider issues of duty and the continued viability of the “public duty rule” in light of the South Carolina Tort Claims Act (TCA), 1 and now affirm the decision of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Braswell v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Steinke v. South Carolina Department of Labor, Licensing & RegulationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  3. Jensen Ex Rel. Estate of Clark v. Anderson County Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  4. Rayfield Ex Rel. Estate of Rayfield v. South Carolina Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988
  5. Tanner v. Florence County TreasurerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Madison Ex Rel. Bryant v. Babcock CenterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  2. Allen v. Great American Reserve Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Cope v. Utah Valley State CollegeUtah Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Edwards v. Lexington County Sheriff's DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Fisher v. PelstringDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2012

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API