Legal Opinion

People v. Trinity Holistic Caregivers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided August 20, 2015No. BR051841PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RICCIARDULLI, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

On May 21, 2013, the voters of the City of Los Angeles (City) approved Proposition D, a measure placed on the ballot by the City Council to regulate medical marijuana businesses (MMB’s). (See City Ordinance No. 182,580.) This measure superseded previous City laws concerning MMB’s, and enacted Los Angeles Municipal Code (LAMC) section 45.19.6.2, subdivision A, making it a misdemeanor to “own, establish, operate, use, or permit the establishment or operation of a [MMB] . . . .”

Proposition D also enacted LAMC section 45.19.6.3, which provides limited…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. FarellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. KingCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
  5. People v. GuzmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. West Valley Caregivers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2015
  2. People v. Optimal Global Healing, Inc.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2015
  3. People v. Onesra Enterprises, Inc.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 2016
  4. People v. CHR Herbal RemediesCalifornia Superior Court · 2017
  5. People v. CHR Herbal RemediesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API