Legal Opinion

Giant Tiger Drugs, Inc. v. Kosydar

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1975No. 74-810PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, J.

In the six cases before the Board of Tax Appeals concerning outdoor advertising signs, the board affirmed the Tax Commissioner’s assessment of sales and use taxes on the total amounts of the purchases.

Appellants, Giant Tiger Drugs, Inc., et al. (hereinafter, Giant Tiger) argue that the portion of the charge which could be shown to be charges for labor should be excepted.:The relevant statutory language, R. C. 5739.01(H), in pertinent part, provides:

“* # * Price does not include the consideration received for labor or services used in installing or applying the property sold if the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sears v. WeimerOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State Ex Rel. Foster v. EvattOhio Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sapina v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Akron Home Medical Services, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Drackett Products Co. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API