Legal Opinion

In re Fenton

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 11, 1971No. 8546PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, Judge.

This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office. Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1-14 in patent application serial No. 373,878, filed June 9,1964, for processes for the liquid-phase oxidation of hydrocarbon olefins in the presence of rhenium compounds. We affirm.

The Subject Matter Olaimed

Claim 1, which is appellant’s broadest claim, reads:

1. An oxidation process which comprises contacting hydrocarbon olefins having 2 to 30 carbon atoms with a rhenium compound selected from the group consisting of rhenium oxide, alkali metal, alkaline earth metal and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Application of Charles D. Prater and James WeiCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1969
  2. Application of Victor v. D'ancicco, William G. Collings and Daniel Robert ShineCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  3. In re ConeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  4. Application of John R. LewisCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  5. In the Matter of the Application of Reedus R. EstesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Filtrol Corporation and Texaco, Inc. v. The Honorable Robert J. Kelleher, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. Reese v. HurstCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  3. In re MurchCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1972
  4. In re BaxterCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1981
  5. Water Technologies Corp. v. Calco, Ltd.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API