Legal Opinion

Brown v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 22, 1914PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from Devin, J., at December Term, 1914, of ObaNg-e.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, O. J.

' This is an action for damages in overflowing the plaintiff’s property by diverting the flow of surface water by building a spur track. The answer denied the allegations of the complaint and alleged that the damage was not caused by defendant diverting the flow of water, but because the plaintiff had permitted drains and ditches about his property to become filled up.

The plaintiff’s property lies just outside the west limit of Hillsboro on the west side of the roadway whose continuation into the town is known as Nash Street. It is not controverted that the plaintiff’s lot is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. Wilmington & Weldon RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
  2. Greenwood v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Phillips v. ChessonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  2. Barcliff v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  3. Darr v. Carolina Aluminum Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Braswell v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Cardwell v. Norfolk & Western RailwaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API