Legal Opinion

Cardwell v. Norfolk & Western Railway

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 19, 1916PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Cline, J., at November Term, 1915, of ROCKINGHAM.

1Opinion of the Court

Clare, O. J.

This is an action for damages to land and crops caused by tbe defendant collecting surface water on the upper side of its roadbed and diverting it through culverts and emptying it on the plaintiff’s bottom-land. The plaintiff admits that the water from three of these culverts flows into ditches which carry it into the plaintiff’s main farm ditch, and thence into the river, without damage. But he alleges that the other three culverts empty the water on the plaintiff’s bottom-land, where there are no ditches, and that this diversion thus drowns out 17 out of 54 acres thereof.

There…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hocutt v. Wilmington & Weldon R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1899
  2. Roberts v. . BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  3. Barcliff v. Norfolk Southern RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  4. Rice v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1902
  5. Brown v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Yowmans v. . HendersonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  2. Yowmans v. City of HendersonvilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Braswell v. State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Peacock v. . GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  5. Shaw v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API