Rader v. Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Chief Justice Bell,
The sole question presented by these appeals is whether the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission is immune from liability in trespass for damage resulting from the negligence of its agents and employees. Although the Courts of Common Pleas have decided this question on numerous occasions, it is one of first impression in this Court and the answer is not easy.
Plaintiffs-appellants instituted the present action in trespass against the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commis*611sion. In their amended complaint they alleged that defendant-Commission allowed ice to accumulate on the…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Petty v. Tennessee-Missouri Bridge CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Brush v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Cali v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
- Scibilia v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Central Contracting Co. v. C. E. Youngdahl & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Weaver v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
- Biello v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Mollan v. LindnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Specter v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.