Legal Opinion

Yokum v. Farmers Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 6, 1993No. 91CV-2219CC; CA A73671PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

In this breach of contract action, plaintiff appeals from a summary judgment for defendant. We affirm.

Plaintiff incurred approximately $125,000 in damages in an automobile accident caused by State Farm Insurance Company’s insured tortfeasor. At that time, the tortfeasor had liability insurance coverage of $50,000. Plaintiff had $100,000 of uninsured/underinsured motorist (UM/ UIM) coverage and $100,000 of personal injury protection (PIP) coverage under a motor vehicle liability policy issued by defendant. Shortly after the accident, defendant paid plaintiff approximately $25,000 in PIP…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. American Economy Insurance v. CanamoreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. Bauder v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mutual of Enumclaw v. BoxIdaho Supreme Court · 1995
  2. MUTUAL OF ENUMCLAW INSURANCE CO. v. KeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  3. Farmers Insurance v. ConnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  4. Gaucin v. Farmers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  5. Harlow v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API