Legal Opinion

Microsoft Corp. v. Franchise Tax Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 2012No. A131964PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DONDERO, J.

In this action, plaintiff Microsoft Corporation seeks a refund of California state corporate franchise taxes paid for the tax years of 1995 and 1996. The taxes were based on income received in connection with the licensing of plaintiff’s software and sales of its keyboard and mouse. Plaintiff claims the royalties it received from computer manufacturers for the licensing of the right to replicate and install its software arise from an intangible property right, and therefore should not have been considered in calculating its tax liability. After a court trial, judgment was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Amador Valley Joint Union High School District v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Microsoft Corp. v. Franchise Tax BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lucent Technologies, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  2. Beyer v. Symantec Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  3. County of Los Angeles v. Employee Relations Commission CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Lucent Technologies v. State Board of Equaliz.California Court of Appeal · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API