Kreuzer v. Cooney
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. Exception. — At the trial the plaintiffs offered the following prayers: 1. That if the jury shall believ.e from the evidence that the property seized under the replevin, and specified in the schedule offered in evidence, was the same property mentioned in the hill of sale from Moses A. Stewart to Joseph Kreuzer and Christopher Kreuzer, (offered in evidence in this cause,) and dated the…
Read the full summary
Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court. Exception. — At the trial the plaintiffs offered the following prayers: 1. That if the jury shall believ.e from the evidence that the property seized under the replevin, and specified in the schedule offered in evidence, was the same property mentioned in the hill of sale from Moses A. Stewart to Joseph Kreuzer and Christopher Kreuzer, (offered in evidence in this cause,) and dated the ninth day of February, 1872, then the verdict of the jury must he for the plaintiffs. 2. That the burden of proof is upon…
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
The appellants brought replevin against the appellee for a certain quantity of type and other materials of a *590printing office. The plaintiffs claimed under a hill of sale to them hy one Stewart, of “all and singular the types, forms, cases, composing stone, tables, hooks, and all other, the materials, utensils, machinery and chattels personal, now in the third story of the building situate in the City of Baltimore, at the northwest corner of Holliday street and Second street, and belonging to said Stewart.” This bill of sale was duly executed, acknowledged and recorded, as required hy the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hart v. EyckNew York Court of Chancery · 1816
- Hamilton v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855
- Brackenridge v. HollandIndiana Supreme Court · 1830
- Chappell v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lightner Mining Co. v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Smith v. MottleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
- Edelhoff & Rinke v. Horner-Miller Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1898
- Ayre v. HixsonOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Brown v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.