Legal Opinion

Brown v. Coleman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 20, 1989No. 70, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELDRIDGE, Judge.

This case involves competing claims of the United States and the victims of a fraudulent investment scheme for the proceeds from a liquidation sale of the defrauder’s assets. The United States asserts that a federal statute entitles its claim to priority. The investors assert that the proceeds are their property because they have sufficiently traced their investments into those proceeds.

I

David Coleman was the owner of Data Video Concepts, Inc., a Delaware corporation qualified to do business in Maryland, trading under the name of Computer Concepts. Computer Concepts operated…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Cunningham v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  4. United States v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. United States v. VermontSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Island Program Designer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
  2. Tauber v. Commonwealth Ex Rel. KilgoreSupreme Court of Virginia · 2002
  3. Starleper v. HamiltonCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  4. Bregman, Berbert & Schwartz, L.L.C. Douglas M. Bregman v. United States of America, Alan F. Post, MovantCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. Credit Bancorp, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API