Legal Opinion
St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. Stuart
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 4, 1935No. 25173PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
This action was commenced by defendant in error, hereinafter referred to as plaintiff, against plaintiff in error, hereinafter referred to as defendant, by plaintiff filing his petition in the district court of Garfield county, Okla., on the 13th day of July, 1932, wherein it is alleged, stated briefly, that plaintiff was in the employ of defendant as a freight train conductor, and was employed as such by defendant on September 18, 1931, and had been so employed since 1919, and was 54 years of age and a strong, able-bodied man in good health; that on said date he received injuries from having…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Mondou v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- North Carolina Railroad v. ZacharySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Gila Valley, Globe & Northern Railway Co. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. GizziSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Miller v. HickmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Safe-Way Cab Service Co. v. GadberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- City of Tulsa v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. v. HerronSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.