Legal Opinion

Northside Railway Co. v. Worthington

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1895No. 252PublishedCited by 71 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Second District, in an appeal from Tarrant County. The opinion gives a sufficient statement.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Chief Justice.

—The following statement of the nature and result in the trial court of this suit is taken from the brief of appellants filed in the Court of Civil Appeals:

“This suit was instituted in December, 1891, by Thomas Worthington, one of the appellees, and plaintiff below, in the District Court of Tarrant County, against the Horthside Railway Company, the Port Worth City Company, the Fort Worth Street Railway Company, Mrs. Sallie Huffman, the Thompson-Houston Electric Company, Brownell Car Company, the Smith Bridge Company, and Aldace W. Caswell. The American Loan and Trust…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Thomas v. Brownville, Fort Kearney, & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Chewacla Lime Works v. Dismukes, Frierson & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1888

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Stephens County v. J. N. McCammon, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1932
  2. People ex rel. Moloney v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Sealy Oil Mill & Mfg. Co. v. Bishop Mfg. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
  4. Roaring Springs Townsite Co. v. Paducah Telephone Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1919
  5. W. C. Bowman Lumber Co. v. PiersonTexas Supreme Court · 1920

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API