Legal Opinion
Federal Welding Service, Inc. v. Dioguardi
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 10, 1960No. Civ. A. No. 18607PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BYERS, District Judge.
The subject matter of this cause is the legal relationship between the parties between 1952 and 1957, shortly after which the litigation was started. The plaintiff manufactured and sold to the defendants during those five years, metal boxes or containers for caskets, and the failure of the defendants to pay for those which were delivered between September and December 1957 and for others which were on hand and ready for delivery, and parts, of the total value of $12,956.-53, constituted the plaintiff’s cause of action.
It was agreed at the trial that the said sum was due…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Supermarket Equipment Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Franke v. WiltschekCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- Schreyer v. Casco Products Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Shellmar Products Co. v. Allen-Qualley Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1936
- Shellmar Products Co. v. Allen-Qualley Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Grismac Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Federal Welding Service, Inc. v. Orestes A. Dioguardi, Jr., and Vincent E. Dioguardi, Copartners Doing Business as Greenpoint Casket CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961