Grismac Corp. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, Judge
This case is before the court on defendant’s exceptions to fact findings, conclusion of law, and proposed opinion filed by Trial Judge C. Murray Bernhardt in accordance with Rule 134(h). The facts found by the court are those stated in this opinion. It is unnecessary to pass on both parties’ exceptions to the trial judge’s fact findings, as they would not change the result if sustained. We differ with the trial judge’s legal conclusions, though we are greatly aided by his able analysis of the novel and interesting problem presented. We conclude that the action cannot be maintained and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Eastport Steamship Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Padbloc Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Dravo Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Shaller v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
- Airmotive Engineering Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Kania v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- City of Alexandria v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Radioptics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
- Garza v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
- City of Klawock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.