Legal Opinion
South Down Recreation Ass'n v. Moran
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided December 10, 1996No. 95-372PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrock, C.J.
The plaintiff, South Down Recreation Association, appeals the Laconia District Court (Huot, J.) dismissal of the plaintiff’s action against the defendants, Philip and Carole Moran. The trial court ruled that it did not have personal jurisdiction over the defendants because service of process was not in accordance with the long-arm statute. See RSA 510:4 (1983 & Supp. 1996). We affirm.
The plaintiff sued the defendants in district court for payment of condominium dues and assessments. See RSA 356-B:15 (1995). The defendants are residents of Salem, Massachusetts. The writ was served on the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Roberts v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
- Leeper v. LeeperSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
- In Re Russell C.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Appeal of Astro Spectacular, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- M & K Welding, Inc. v. Leasing Partners, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Estate of Lunt v. GaylorSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
- Hull v. Town of PlymouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
- Nashua Teachers Union v. Nashua School DistrictSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1998
- Impact Food Sales, Inc. v. EvansSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.