Legal Opinion

Cone v. Bell

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 28, 2009No. 07-1114PublishedCited by 970 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stevens

The right to a fair trial, guaranteed to state criminal defendants by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, imposes on States certain duties consistent with their sovereign obligation to ensure “that ‘justice shall be done’” in all criminal prosecutions. United States v. Agurs, 427 U. S. 97, 111 (1976) (quoting Berger v. United States, 295 U. S. 78, 88 (1935)). In Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83 (1963), we held that when a State suppresses evidence favorable to an accused that is material to guilt or to punishment, the State violates the defendant’s right to due process,…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by970 opinions

  1. Renico v. LettSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Skinner v. SwitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Smith v. CainSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  4. Jeffrey Wogenstahl v. Betty MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  5. Jackson v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014

965 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API