Legal Opinion
United States v. Commisso
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
Decided June 26, 2017No. 16-0555/ARPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judge RYAN
delivered the opinion of the Court,
An officer panel sitting as a general court-martial convicted Appellant, contrary to his pleas, of the following: one specification each of violating a lawful general regulation, making a false official statement, indecent viewing of a person’s private area, indecent recording of a person’s private area, wrongful distribution of a recording of a person’s private area, and obstruction of justice, and two specifications of abusive sexual contact, in violation of Articles 92, 107, 120, 120c, and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States v. BeckerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
- United States v. BeckerNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2021
- United States v. CabreraNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
- United States v. CriswellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
- United States v. CriswellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2018
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.