Fortino Alvarez v. Randy Tracy
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Concurrence
Concurrence by
Judge Kozinski;
Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge O’Scannlain
ORDER
The petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED. The opinion and dissent filed on December 8, 2014 and published at 773 F.3d 1011 are withdrawn. They are replaced by the new opinion and dissent filed concurrently with this order. The pending petition for rehearing en banc is DENIED as moot. The parties may file new petitions for panel rehearing or rehearing en banc within 14 days.
OPINION
KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge:
We consider whether an Indian tribe violated a criminal defendant’s rights by failing to inform…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Kevin Howlett v. The Salish and Kootenal Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, MontanaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- Grand Canyon Skywalkdevelopment v. 'Sa' Nyu Wa IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Bruce Johnson v. Gila River Indian Community Lone Butte Industrial Development Corporation, a Corporation Chartered by the Gila River Indian CommunityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- State v. VernonNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
- Doreen Randall v. Yakima Nation Tribal Court, And, Davis Washines, Chief of Police for the Yakima Nation, Sub. Nom.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- World Fuel Services v. Nambe Pueblo DevelopmentDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2019
- Daniel Warmenhoven v. Netapp, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Kevin Johnson v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025
- Kevin Johnson v. Superintendent Mahanoy SCICourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2025
- Loonsfoot v. BroganDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2021
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.