Legal Opinion

Kevin Howlett v. The Salish and Kootenal Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Montana

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 22, 1976No. 75--1478PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BARNES, SNEED and KENNEDY, Circuit Judges. BARNES, Senior Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves two plaintiffs, Kevin Howlett and Bernard Clairmont, members of the Salish and Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Montana [herein Tribes] who contend that the refusal of the Tribes to declare them eligible candidates for tribal council membership deprived them of their right to travel and their right to run for office in violation of Section 1302(8) of the Indian Civil Rights Act (25 U.S.C. § 1302(8) (1968)). Plaintiffs’ ineligibility was based upon their failure to satisfy the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. GuestSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. George Groundhog v. W. W. KeelerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
  5. Chimento v. StarkDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 1973

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. White v. ManchinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Ralph R. Tom v. William Sutton, Jailor, Whatcom CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. Tracy v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  4. United States v. Ross Allen DohertyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  5. Stands Over Bull v. Bureau of Indian AffairsDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1977

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API